Showing posts with label belly dance styles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label belly dance styles. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Styles of Belly Dance


For students new to belly dance, it can be confusing to understand the differences and distinctions between the various styles of belly dance. I know in my own personal dance journey, it took me many years to be able to understand and recognize the different styles.

Depending on who you ask, you'll most certainly receive different responses on what the main categorical styles of belly dance are. For example, some dancers may include Lebanese as its own belly dance style. While there have been particular Lebanese dancers, like Nadia Gamal, who embody their own distinct style, as a collective group, I personally don't see enough distinction in Lebanese belly dance to formally recognize it as its own style of belly dance. For me, the classifications below are the six main belly dance styles.

Modern Egyptian: Modern Egyptian belly dance, is a style of belly dance originating, as the name denotes, from Egypt from about the 1970s onward. Modern Egyptian is basically an evolved and polished up version of raqs beledi.  Raqs Beledi is a traditional folkloric dance of Egyptian sharing much of the same basic dance vocabulary as belly dance. (Stay tuned for a future post on raqs beledi which will clarify and delve into this dance in more detail). Raqs Beledi first paved the way for the creation of Vintage Egyptian style belly dance (see below), and later unfolded into what is known as Modern Egyptian.  Modern Egyptian belly dance was shaped in large part by the influence of Mahmoud Reda, who incorporated ballet into traditional Egyptian folkloric dances, and also trained belly dancers. This transfer of influence is seen in the Modern Egyptian style in the elevated carriage of the dancer, frequency of isolations and traveling steps performed on the balls of the feet, and the graceful arm and hand positioning. Other distinctions of Modern Egyptian style include powerful hip shimmies performed with a "straight leg", intricate hip articulations, quick changes of weight, and an absence of floorwork, due to it being frowned upon by current day Egyptian culture. Dancers who perform this style of belly dance include Dina, Lucy, and Randa Kamel.

Vintage Egyptian: Vintage Egyptian has many similarities to Modern Egyptian, but the main difference is that there is less ballet influence and more beledi influence, since this style was closer to the beledi source and a precursor for Modern Egyptian. Vintage Egyptian is distinguished by isolations made predominately in the hips, minimal upper body isolations, and deeper grounding through the feet. This style of dance is also typically distinguished by soft, rounded movements, rather than the sharp, staccato isolations seen more frequently in current styles of belly dance. This style of belly dance had its heyday in the 1920s to 1960s, and was made popular first by the influence of Badia Masabni and the dancers she trained for her nightclubs, including Tayhia Karoka and Samia Gamal, and then by the inclusion of these dancers and others, like Naima Akef, in popular Egyptian movies. In my opinion, it was Badia Masabni and her nightclub, Casino Opera, who can be credited with taking traditional raqs beledi, a folkloric dance, and changing it to create modern day belly dance.

Turkish: Turkish style belly dance is lively and dramatic, due to influences from traditional Romany folk dance, which also embodies that same spirited nature. Distinctions of Turkish style belly dance include small hops, kicks with the feet, spins, and prominent use of floorwork. Turkish dancers are also more likely to play zills, then Egyptian dancers who are more likely to be backed by a full orchestra, thus negating the need to play a musical instrument themselves. In terms of costuming, Turkish costuming originally included heavy use of long fringe, which has in more recent years given way to more risque trends marked by reveling splits in chiffon skirts and sultry cutouts, which is likely due in large part to the influence of the costume designers Bella and Sim Moda Evi. Dancers who perform this style include Didem Kenali and Ruby Beh.

American Cabaret: As the name implies, American Cabaret is a style developed in the U.S. Dating back to approximately the 1950s and 1960s, this style of dance, drew from vintage Egyptian dancing, but also drew a good deal from fantasy and artistic license to bring to life American ideas of exotic orientalism. This style of dance was also influenced by necessity. Dance sets in the U.S. used to be much longer than they are today, with dancers frequently performing for up to 45 minutes at a time and thus needing more elements to incorporate into their performances to maintain variety and keep audience attention. Thus, American Cabaret utilizes props much more heavily than its Middle Eastern style counterparts. Veil work and draping became a prominent feature of American Cabaret. Whereas in Egyptian belly dance, the dancer typically only enters with the veil, swirls it around a few times, and then discards it; American Cabaret frequently features elaborate veil wraps and technically advanced veil work. Sword dancing was also an American Cabaret invention, and in more recent years, this style has also added other props like Isis wings and fan veils. Belly rolls and flutters, and even coin tricks, also became a prominent feature of this style. Early American Cabaret also set the precedent for the standard five part belly dance set: upbeat intro with finger cymbals, a slow taqsim potentially including use of veil or floorwork, another upbeat or possibly folkloric song, a drum solo, and an exit piece.  Dancers who perform this style in include Delilah of Seattle and Suhaila Salimpour.

Tribal: Tribal belly dance is also an American invention. The key distinction of tribal style belly dance is the use of group improvisation as created by Carolena Nericcio of FatChanceBellyDance, using inspiration from Jamila Salimpour and her troupe, Bal Anat, as well as Jamila's student, Masha Archer. Carolena's creation became known as American Tribal Style. Group improvization involves one dancer using predertermined cues to signal to the rest of the group the combination of movements that they should perform, with the lead dancer rotating throughout the group during the performance. Offshoots were developed later by other dancers, such as Improvisational Tribal Style (ITS) created by Amy Sigil of Unmata. Tribal style belly dance has very unique and distinct costuming, which includes voluminous skirts and pantaloons and heavy ethnic jewelry, frequently reminiscent of Kuchi tribal jewelry (nomadic Pashtoon tribes near the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan), and often also includes decorative hairpieces and dark, smoky makeup.

Fusion: Fusion belly dance is a melting pot category for what's left over, and as the name implies, typically involves fusing belly dance with some other type of dance. Fusion belly dance could easily be broken down into further sub-categories, such as tribal fusion, goth belly dance, steampunk belly dance, hula hoop belly dance, and on and on. Examples of this include former Bellydance Superstar member, Sabah, who fuses belly dance with ballet on pointe. Or another former Bellydance Superstar, Rachel Brice, who performs her own unique style of tribal fusion, complete with amazing Turkish drops.

Folkloric: Folkloric dance is not actually belly dance.  In my opinion, folkloric dance is its own genre of dance, and thus a miscategorization to list it here. However, I wanted to include it to make that important distinction. Folkloric dancing refers to the simple dances performed by and for the people in any given country of origin. The dances are typically simple in nature so that they can be executed by people who are not trained professional dancers. They are also typically dances that date back many years and originally involved traditional styles of dress. Examples of these styles of dances are the Moroccan guedra, Egyptian fellaheen, and the Lebanese debke. I would also put Egyptian beledi in this category and not under the umbrella of belly dance. Folkloric dances can also be turned into theatrical folkloric dance, which is taking the basic components of a folkloric dance and adding additional non-traditional embellishes and choreography to make it really capture and hold the attention of an audience. Mahmoud Reda and the Reda Troupe were a prime example of this. You can read about Reda and his world-famous troupe here.

Whether you agree with my classifications or not, I think one fact is undebatable: belly dancers are a creative bunch. New fusions styles and influences are created all the time. In recent years, there has been considerable influence coming from Russia, with the formidable Dariya Mistskevich leading the way. Maybe someday Russian will be recognized as its own style of belly dance. Only time will tell.

Photo Credit: Ruby Beh

Thursday, July 31, 2014

What is the Right Way to Belly Dance?


What is the right way to belly dance? This question has been swimming around in my head lately, as within the belly dance community there seem to be some fairly opinionated thoughts on this topic. I really got to thinking about this topic after reading a recent article written by Leila Farid of Cairo on Gilded Serpent in which she critiques Ukrainian dancer Alla Kushnir against the Egyptian dancers Tahia Karaoka and Dina, essentially stating that Alla Kushnir's dance is too technique and movement based, while lacking in emotional depth and subtlety.  (Before moving on, I would like to clarify so that I'm not putting words into the author's mouth that weren't said: Farid never uses the words "right" and "wrong" in her article or any variation of them, and ultimately the message of her article that I walked away with was to promote cultural awareness.  But I did see her article setting the stage for this type of discussion, which it certainly did across various belly dance forums and news feeds after it was published.  Therefore this post does not represent some type of response or counter-argument to Farid's article, but rather a progression of thought.)

I have to be honest, when I first entered this art form, I never imagined that there would be so many "rules". Rules about how to interpret the music, what to wear, how to represent culture, how to put together your performance set, and so on. And yes, at least initially, I agree that knowing and studying the "rules" including cultural context, especially for a dancer presenting herself as a professional, is a requirement. Heck, I even posted my own set of "rules" quite recently on when, in my personal opinion, a dancer is qualified to be a professional.  So I'm not proposing some type of dance anarchy. 

But when does it all become too much?  When does appreciating culture and history turn into just drawing an arbitrary line in the sand?  When does following the rules start inhibiting creative expression and personal authenticity?

Coming back to the examples that Farid used in her article, to me when I watch the videos, the main thing I see is that they are different. I don't see that any of the three performances are inherently better or worse. Or that one style stands out as the "right", "correct", or "better" way to belly dance.  I think each dancer is representative of her own style, including the time period and cultural background that she is dancing in.  Watching the three videos, you can definitely see an evolution of style.  In a global context, performance art in general has moved toward a more flashy, in-your-face and frequently trick-based focus.  You may personally like it or dislike it, but I don't think it's either right or wrong, because art can't be put into boxes of right or wrong.  Art just is.  You can personally feel drawn to it, repelled by it, or feel neutrally.  But that still doesn't make it right or wrong.  To me, all art, including dance, exists on a different plane where this type of black and white judgment isn't relevant.

Putting the comparison of Karoaka to Kushir into an American cultural context, I think it's like comparing the talents of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers to the professional dancers on Dancing With the Stars.  Astaire and Rogers are smooth and classy.  When I watch them, I can feel myself sink down into their performance, comforted and wrapped up in it.  They are timeless.  Watching the pros on Dancing with the Stars, I am drawn in by their athleticism and power.  It's sexy and fast-paced, bringing me to the edge of my seat.  I like both styles. I can appreciate both styles. And I think there's room for both in the dance world. I don't look at one set and think that their style and their interpretation is incorrect. All art, dance or otherwise, evolves and changes to represent the time period and the location it's being created in, belly dance in Egypt being no exception.

But rather than criticizing evolution or differences, I believe there can be great merit to adaption.  And in terms of developing a personal style, I believe it should absolutely be embraced, because ultimately that's the purpose of art: to enjoy a personal and meaningful communication with others.   Isn't that why we create to begin with?  To sacredly surrender a portion of ourselves to our fellow human beings?  Thus I think the only "wrong" way to dance is to dance in-authentically to yourself.  There's no point in trying to be a copy of someone else, of trying to replicate someones dance in exactly the same manner and fashion.  Each dancer will have her own strengths and weaknesses, and her own cultural and physical background that she brings to the table with her.  While it's important to understand the history of the dance, each dancer needs to also look forward and honor her own journey through it.  I believe that once a dancer knows what the "rules" are, the dancer can make the informed decision to break them if she so desires. Yes, it might mean that some people will dislike her performance.  It might mean that her performance is not traditional or "authentic", but as long as she's not representing it as such (or hired for such), why does it matter?  I think the great Martha Graham summed it all up when she said, "You are unique, and if that is not fulfilled, then something is lost."

Photo Credit: Unknown